Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; OHelix; wardaddy; Pelham; rustbucket; PeaRidge
Guys, the point being discussed is that period after the war in which whites were disenfranchised and only blacks could vote, and which resulted in mostly black congressmen and legislators being elected.

I read in a history book years ago that entire legislatures were comprised of black legislators, and that they didn't know what they were doing and consequently embarrassed Washington DC with their ineptitude.

Do any of you recall a source for this information?

I am unaware of repression to the extent that no whites could vote, but have a source that Southern Democrats had a very difficult time registering to vote, leading to a result similar to what you describe.

Frank Conner, The South Under Siege 1830-2000, A istory of the Relations Between the North and the South, Second Ed., Collards Publishing Co., Newman, Ga., (2002) pp. 197-192; 199-200.

The First Reconstruction Act, of 2 March 1867, required the Sou­thern states to enfranchise the blacks and ratify the Fourteenth Amend­ment. It also divided the South into five military districts, to be ruled by U.S. Army generals. Initially, Generals John M. Schofield, Daniel E. Sickles, George H. Thomas, Edward O.C. Ord, and Philip H. Sheridan commanded those districts. Several of those generals—including Sheri­dan—had already demonstrated their deep compassion for the South.

The Second Reconstruction Act, of 23 March 1867, called for the U.S. Army to oversee the registration of eligible voters in each Southern territory/state/whatever; and for the election of delegates to a constitutio­nal convention therein; and for the writing of a new state constitution; and for the ratification of that constitution by at least half of the regis­tered voters; and for the approval of that constitution by the Radical Re­publican Congress. When all of that had been accomplished, Congress would then seat that state’s elected senators and congressmen; and theo­retically the military occupation would end. The third act, of 19 July 1867, spelled out the facts of life in this new regime: the military commanders would have complete power over all civil government in the South; and the voter-registration boards (named by the military authorities) could arbitrarily deny the vote to anyone: in other words, Southern Democrats would have a very hard time getting registered to vote.

The fourth act, of 11 March 1868, repealed the requirement that at least 50% of the voters must ratify the new state constitutions. Its purpose was to speed up the reentry of the remaining Southern territories/ states into the Union, such that their black and Scalawag constituencies would get to vote for Grant in the 1868 presidential election—thus enab­ling him to win.

The U.S. military commanders of the South followed the orders of the Radical Republicans in Washington. Arbitrarily they removed the sit­ting governors of Georgia, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, and Virginia. They replaced all levels of elected and appointed officials in the state governments with soldiers or Scalawags whenever it appeared that the lawfully-elected/appointed civil officials might not be attuned slavishly to the wishes of the Republican Congress.

[...]

Droves of carpetbaggers came South to make their fortunes in public office. They were joined by numbers of Scalawags and ex-slaves.

In 1868, the seven so-far-reinstated Southern states sent 49 senators and congressmen to Washington. Of them, 30 were Northerners who had come South since the end of the war. In the 40th Congress, 20 of 22 Sou­thern senators, and 44 of 58 congressmen, were Republicans. Among them, two senators and 12 congressmen were black.

In many cases, the state legislatures, school boards, and/or militias were filled with illiterate blacks who had no notion of the workings of civil government. The lieutenant governors of Florida, Louisiana, Missis­sippi, and South Carolina were black. A majority of the state legislators of South Carolina were black.


52 posted on 06/24/2020 12:38:39 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: woodpusher
Thanks. That's close to what I recall reading many years ago. While it is not exactly the same thing I recall, it does constitute supporting evidence for it.
54 posted on 06/24/2020 1:01:18 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson