And in the 1992 ones the police leadership hardly receive a favorable narrative... the Koreans were left to fend for themselves because the cops only saw it fit to defend white, affluent neighborhoods like Beverly Hills.
I watched those riots and it confirmed my core belief that an armed society is a polite society.
L
Last sentencee sez it all,
The Roof Koreans provide a perfect, real-life counter argument to the idiotic question of gun grabbers that free men justify why they “need” certain arms to defend themselves. If ever anyone “needed” a fully automatic rifle with a 100-round magazine, it was the Korean community of Los Angeles.
Libs get to thanks them selves for kissing gun control good by.
After these past few weeks sales are booming
Btw, the Koreans were not the only one's defending their properties due to little or no protection from the cops.
Thousands of people armed up all over the region, they were on their roofs, pouches, at their businesses etc.
Many more people were killed in that LA '92 event than all the riots nationwide in 2020. It was war and I hope to hell I'm never close to anything like that again.
“...in response to violent and frequently racist attacks on their communities and businesses by primarily black looters and rioters...”
Actually, many of the looters were Hispanic, and the Koreans got into gun battles with cars of Latino gangs that attacked them.
The police just sat and watched.
Korean shop owners opening fire on black gangs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py4AMYebHGI
They didn’t take any sh*t.
To this day they don’t know how many rioters/looters were killed. The police didn’t keep track, they just scooped them up after the riots were over and disposed of them. No one took any action against the Koreans.
Understand, virtually all of the Korean men had done two years compulsory military service in the ROK army.