[EasySt]

Looks like you stirred up a severely concerned set of “Karens”...

First for kindly letting us know it was a 2016 article,
then for making some reasonable observations,
and for highlighting connections contained within.

You must be over the target.

Thanks for posting!

[Pelham]

Well aren’t you clever. It actually means that you don’t understand what’s in that paper any better than he does. Assuming that you tried to read it, which is doubtful.