[Disestablishmentarian]

You are also correct that the court has left it up to the Trump Admin to fabricate a proper canceling of the previous EO.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think, based upon Kavanaugh's Comments in Dissent, that if Trump is reelected the DHS will be able to "Dot the i's and cross the t's" to get this done.

SCOTUS did not rule on the legality of DACA this time around, just the procedural issues.

In 2016 the SCOTUS split 4-4 on the constitutionality of DACA, due to 187 of Justice Scalia.

[Oscar in Batangas]

Unprecedented!???
Executive orders are only as permanent as the succeeding presidencies want them to be...RIGHT?
How come Donald Trump has to jump thru hoops never before invented? EVERY TIME???

[little jeremiah]

I think, based upon Kavanaugh's Comments in Dissent, that if Trump is reelected the DHS will be able to "Dot the i's and cross the t's" to get this done.

SCOTUS did not rule on the legality of DACA this time around, just the procedural issues.

In 2016 the SCOTUS split 4-4 on the constitutionality of DACA, due to 187 of Justice Scalia.

Does this make sense to you? I'm struggling with this, relates to your comments above.

Bc of this ruling today , the Dems CAN NOT STOP DJT when it comes to EXECUTIVE ORDERS.

The only person who can undo an Executive Order is the POTUS. https://t.co/QT9WSZcHhG— l E T 17 (@Inevitable_ET) June 18, 2020

2:20 video:

So an Executive Order can be reversed by a Executive Order? #TheMoreYouKnow pic.twitter.com/pmuwf6XsDC— Karli Q ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@KarluskaP) June 18, 2020

[stylin19a]

In 2016 the SCOTUS split 4-4 on the constitutionality of DACA, due to 187 of Justice Scalia.

always wondered why this wasn't brought up again when SCOTUS got to full strength...