“Why would you object to that?”
Not only,’no objections’, but I see the author as an honest broker of his position.
We all have biases. The problem arises when it becomes ‘settled science’.
None can pass the Turing test or Chinese room test.
“The oracle of Delphi in ancient Greece must have neglected to register a website.”
Sadly the Greeks have had some lean years and probably lost or sold their domain?
I will grant he is a broker of his position (obviously, by definition), but “honest” when there is a clear enviro-political agenda he is, ahem, driving, and he is financially invested in that position?
As honest as, say, inventor-of-the-internet and all-round good guy, Nobel laureate Al Gore? (Checks the boxes for both biases - ideology and personal profit.)
Funny you should mention “settled science” in that context. Because we all know it is not so.
But let’s get back on track to my original argument: Less complexity in automotive *user interfaces* of the electronic gizmo variety is IMO better. That is all.