Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: xone
Here’s a Wiki tally of where UN troops are reported to be stationed.

That is a list of peacekeeper providers, not where they are stationed. 3rd world uses the UN for experience and hard currency for their soldiers. The countries make about $1500/man/month. These aren't infantry, at best MPs. Civilian Americans would annihilate them. At any time they got 80k of them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In searching for "how the UN does what it does" I came across the UN performance in Haiti, the country upon which Bill and Hillary Clinton fed.

UN's Deadly Legacy in Haiti 'Peacekeepers' By Benjamin Terrall

OhmyNews
February 7, 2007

"until 2004, the United Nations, for good reasons, only deployed peace keepers where there was a peace agreement to enforce. Only in Haiti has the Security Council deployed Blue Helmets to enforce a coup d'etat against an elected government."

The article goes on to note that citizens have been "... arrested, tortured and exiled by the coup regime which the U.N. mission in effect was set up to support. This essential fact rarely appears in media analysis of Haiti, so few in the U.S. understand why some have taken up arms to defend their neighborhoods."

 
~~~~~~~~~~

I believe US public should take note of the UN's strategy for "helping" maintain a coup regime all nice 'n polite like.

The UN starts slow, annoucing a "temporary" solution to protect vulnerable citizens during a time of unrest. Under riot conditions, the citizenry may have been glad for the temporary help. Once emplaced, the UN then rolls out long-term occupation that the public cannot refuse. [ a.k.a. Foot-in-the-door, Camel's-nose-under-the-tent]

Step One: In 2004, the UN authorized a Multinational Interim Force (MIF) to maintain order in Haiti for 3 months.

Step Two: The UN then authorized the MINUSTAH to stay in Haiti from 2004 to 2017.

I suspect the surprise result of othe US Election in fall of 2016 set in motion the end of the MINUSTAH in Haiti.

"The United Nations Stabilisation Mission in Haiti, also known as MINUSTAH, an acronym of the French name, was a UN peacekeeping mission in Haiti that was in operation from 2004 to 2017. The mission's military component was led by the Brazilian Army and the force commander was Brazilian. Wikipedia"

With the UN's assignment of the Brazilian Army to support the coup regime, Bill and Hillary probably felt safe raping Haiti and getting away with it.

Since the UN employed the Brazilian Army to maintain the coup regime, those troops would not fall into lists of UN personnel stationed in foreign countries. But the UN would have a smaller number of advisors/handlers and perhaps some troops of it's own if it thought it necessary. I recall UN troops were caught raping civilians on a 3rd world "peace keeping" deployment and those were truly UN employees.

Haiti is small, so they gave the Brazilian Army and a Brazilian force commander control  of the country. To support a coup regime the US, the UN would need more troops and more sophisticated, well-equipped military presence, likely coordinated by a major geopolitical player (e.g., China)

I think that article gives me a better idea of what UN involvement in the US could look like.

From the same article, a quote with a few details about how long-term occupation by the UN's Brazilian Army troops in Haiti impacted the public:

"....MINUSTAH declined to dislodge the paramilitary groups that helped to overthrow the government from police stations. In August, 2005, a paramilitary group called the Little Machete Army killed dozens of spectators at a soccer game in broad daylight, near a MINUSTAH observation post. MINUSTAH never tried to stop the massacre or pursue paramilitary members, even though the group has terrorized the Grande Ravine area for two years." Antifa would approve.

1,219 posted on 06/14/2020 10:46:57 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1196 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote; little jeremiah
This will be useful to you. Has the UN declared martial law before? Yes.

Online copy of the book 'The Fearful Master - A Second Look at the United Nations'

Introduction:

"The Fearful Master, concisely written and well documented, sets forth the double standard which guides the UN through its devious and treacherous path toward world domination.The author, Mr. G. Edward Griffin, has performed an outstanding service in giving the people of the free world a picture of what has happened, is happening, and will happen in the very near future--if we continue our course of strategic surrender to international forces.The book opens with the story of Katanga and reveals the broken promises which the UN made to Moise Tshombe in order to deceive him, and to turn over to the central government the only province of the Congo where law and order had prevailed and where freedom was the watchword of its leaders."

"The murder, pillaging and rape practiced by the UN forces in Katanga can happen to any country that surrenders to UN control.

Author Griffin outlines in considerable detail the Communist infiltration into the personnel at every echelon of the UN, and he exposes the treachery and subversion that flourishes there.The author meticulously outlines the grand design for surrender, and likens it to a jigsaw puzzle."

"The chief designer is well aware of the ultimate picture, but an individual working on an indiscernible piece of that puzzle does not know exactly what he is doing or where it will fit into the picture. When all of the pieces are put together, however, the finished grand design will be that of a one-world government maintained by forces against which resistance by any nation will be futile.

"The Fearful Master is a book which is long overdue, but I prayerfully hope that it is not yet too late to awaken the American public. This book should be read by all Americans and demands their thoughtful and immediate attention."

James B. Utt
Member of Congress

-------------------

Rev. 13:4 "...and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?" 

1,222 posted on 06/14/2020 11:29:01 PM PDT by Ymani Cricket ("Leadership is intangible, and therefore no weapon ever designed can replace it." ~Omar Bradley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote

So in Haiti, basically the UN troops were stationed to be sure nobody got in the way of the local Antigua-like outfit......got it!


1,246 posted on 06/15/2020 3:37:09 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you don't understand, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
has the Security Council

Crinton's Security Council. Any deployment by the UN Security Council is subject to a US veto. No blue helmets to shoot at, but I'm sure lots of blather. As for Anqueefa, they can't join any UN force without being subject to LOAC. As citizens there is no 'right' to treason, unless of course you win.

1,250 posted on 06/15/2020 5:02:36 AM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson