[precisionshootist]

"Just further proof that those in positions of power believe they are above the law. Slashing tires because they “might” be used in a crime? This is an example for the contempt of a citizen’s rights. If I were to slash a tire, I would go to jail, and rightly so. But because someone in authority does it, it is A.O.K? "

Ironicly it's proof we actually have a major problem with the police. Unfortunately the rioters dilute this issue and muddy the waters making the true nature of the problem impossible to see.

The problem is we have a highly militarized police culture. This militarization has created a mindset that officers see every person as a threat rather than a citizen. At the same time we have too many laws.

This all started in the 70's with the advent of the SWAT team. SWAT teams planted the seed for the conflict we have today.

[cyclotic]

I see little need for militarized police. Until there’s a big riot and you need them.

I believe SWAT has a place but that it should be highly limited. I used to know a guy who was on a national team for a Federal agency.

When they did a raid, it was scheduled, not just let’s go. He sometimes had to fly cross country for a raid, so there was a significant cost. That alone limited the use.

When a local department has all the cool toys they’ll find the excuses to use them, often unwisely.

[SandwicheGuy]

The problem is we have a highly militarized police culture. This militarization has created a mindset that officers see every person as a threat rather than a citizen. At the same time we have too many laws. This all started in the 70's with the advent of the SWAT team. SWAT teams planted the seed for the conflict we have today.

That is exactly correct. And at the same time, the name of the police was changed from Peace Officer (PO) to Law Enforcement Officer(LEO).So the police went from keeping the peace to being a revenue agent for the State. Hmmm, how is that working out.