[ransomnote]

Okay I am replying to my own post upthread wherein I gathered Tweet content with a theory about the “reconcile George Floyd” wherein the Tweeter asserts the image cannot be dynamically updated and therefore debunks Posobiec et. al. But at the end of that thread a new intrigue arose and the Tweeter was hot on the trail analyzing it again.

Now I’ve come across another theory explaining Q is trolling and the drop is not what we think it means.

I suppose that’s all well and good because I hadn’t really grasped it in the first place.

Here’s a “reconcile” Q drop trolling theory.

https://twitter.com/QNE_ANQN/status/1269461234400792578

[Ymani Cricket]

This one also explains it in plain language for those not so technically inclined:

Hahaha!!!! Hey everyone read this thread carefully, you'll be glad you did.
(1) Q just checkmated a pack a demon clowns attacking Q on 8kun. This is so "technical" related (dealing with computer coding) that after Q smoked them Q comes back with— Truth and Art TV (@TruthandArtTV1) June 7, 2020

[meadsjn]

@Truthhammer888 on that thread explained why Q said the message was not for anons.

The Obama.org developers were caught using the validator function to "test" the image prior the the Floyd event, even though it was not posted until after the event.

The Q message was to inform the Obama.org people that they were caught, they had foreknowledge.

Magically, last night was relatively quiet.

[TruthWillWin]

Okay I am replying to my own post upthread wherein I gathered Tweet content with a theory about the “reconcile George Floyd” wherein the Tweeter asserts the image cannot be dynamically updated and therefore debunks Posobiec et. al. But at the end of that thread a new intrigue arose and the Tweeter was hot on the trail analyzing it again.

Now I’ve come across another theory explaining Q is trolling and the drop is not what we think it means.

Another theory: