Posted on 06/05/2020 8:43:18 AM PDT by Steve1999
Hillary Clinton has just been dealt a huge blow from a federal judge, who ordered the twice-failed Democratic presidential candidate to testify under oath on her alleged email abuse. The former U.S. secretary of state must submit to a deposition by Judicial Watch, a political watchdog group that sued over Clinton's use of a private email server, the court ruled.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
At this point... WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? * Hillary quote
Let’s get to the GOOD STUFF and have her “out” the encrypted blackberry ring...Strzok !!!
orders her to testify...
in SEPTEMBER.
at which point there will be another delaying motion.
anything they can do to delay, as they’re hoping to oust
President Trump and kill the case.
she should’ve been reschedule to next week.
Jello
“I don’t recall, I can’t remember, I have no recollection of that, or she takes the 5th”,Take your pick.
If anybody can work the hag b**ch over its JW.
I bet this interview will be a little different than the Comey FBI interview.
is there any truth to that Hillary did not have or ask Obama for a State Department Inspector General?
It’ll just be the same old crap from Hitlery under oath or not.................’I can’t recall, I don’t remember’ and no consequences.
The most ‘Intelligent woman on earth...” with no memory?
they night he died Just kidding I’m sure she paid someone to do it when she paid the CO to turn off the cameras. She always has plausible deniability
How could this be, I thought the Appeals Court Overturned this Judges order after he committed Suicide next Week??
After her testimony will she high five everyone in the room like she did once before and not under oath?
Before Ambassador Grenell began declassifying and releasing information, nearly EVERYTHING discovered about the organized criminal enterprise known as the Obama regime was due to Judicial Watch.
It will probably go nowhere, and other than NewsMax, OAN and Fox, no other media outlet will cover it.
Mark
Fortran? It’s been a very long time (40+ years!)
Mark
March her in wearing canckle restraints.
“I’d bet that she refuses to comply as part of the resistance.”
I suspect that her lawyer isn’t dumb enough to let her try that stunt. The judge can have her cuffed and thrown in jail, immediately. More likely the 5th.
> Fortran?
Not that old. Pascal (sort of)
She did it as a result of a YouTube video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.