[bitt]

I corrected my statement wrongly and I will stop typing for a while until brain/fingers etc all coordinated. Simply put, I will leave the guy off the threads totally.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

uh, sorry, I like reading what he says - if people think lamecherry or Johnwhatever is worth reading, so is Cates. As usual, we make our own decisions as to what is interesting worthy...

[smileyface]

I agree with you bitt.

Cates, LameCherry, Johnheretohelp, Wictor, Neon, for me Sarah Westall, Linda Paris, Daniel Lee, IPOT, Dave Janda, You Are Free TV...all links to discussion are helpful. Some of the posters outside the thread may be disinfo or black hats, but many draw in outside info, which can be taken in reviewed and considered.

The whole thread does not need to choke on it, but a link of the thread/youtube/bitchute with a brief description of content/slant is helpful.

I would rather err on the side of too much info, than be curtailed in information sourcing and be doomed to total groupthink.

Ransomnote is the threadkeeper. If she does not want it here, so be it —But forbidding thought and discussion of ideas may drive people away. If twitter/youtube posters are verboten (just like certain topics) there needs to be an official list.

Is that the purpose of Q?

[christianbasque]

I corrected my statement wrongly and I will stop typing for a while until brain/fingers etc all coordinated. Simply put, I will leave the guy off the threads totally.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

uh, sorry, I like reading what he says - if people think lamecherry or Johnwhatever is worth reading, so is Cates. As usual, we make our own decisions as to what is interesting worthy...
*************************
Agreed

[bagster]

if people think lamecherry or Johnwhatever is worth reading, so is Cates.

Yea, but lamecherry and johnwhatever aren't working contrary to Qanon and they don't hate Trump.

And they aren't ginormously, morbidly, grotesquely fat with bizarre pinheads.

#Context

[little jeremiah]

Freepmail just sent.