You put a fine point on that bob.
I’m not trying to be a jerk, but every time something like this happens, no one can resist jumping to conclusions even though we’ve seen time and again that first impressions and initial information is often wrong. Nobody’s going to say the cop wasn’t out of line, he’s been in trouble before for excessive force, he’s probably a thug etc. But this isn’t happening because he’s a rotten cop, it’s because the court of public opinion has found him guilty of murder.
So what if the initial autopsy results are upheld by Dr. Baden, who seems to be a straight-shooter.
Will the evidence show that the cops actions were the cause of death? What is the legal standard against which it must be proven? What will happen if murder charge can’t be proven? Or if he is charged and the evidence doesn’t result in a conviction?
Critical thinking. We’ve seen this movie before.