Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

This is Insanity!! Face masks don’t do Jack,and are probably worse for you and the spread of the benign chicom flu


4 posted on 05/17/2020 6:28:48 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: eyeamok

https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-the-healthy/


14 posted on 05/17/2020 6:40:52 PM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok
Hmmmmm.. Do the home made cotton/filter/cotton material masks induce nausea, light headness, low oxygenation of blood, increase of CO2 inhalation??? Are these conditions placing young children, the elderly at risk???

Seems there are more and more anecdotal stories regarding these conditions.


15 posted on 05/17/2020 6:41:05 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

And just how do they intend to enforce this ridiculous edict


19 posted on 05/17/2020 6:48:21 PM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: eyeamok

I’m an indoor air quality consultant so I get to read and study some obscure stuff.

Please see below, this was a USA, OSHA document from 2009

Very small excerpt from a document entitled

PANDEMIC INFLUENZA PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE GUIDANCE FOR HEALTHCARE WORKERS AND HEALTHCARE EMPLOYERS. Occupational Safety and Health Administration 2009

“When personal protective equipment is necessary to protect against droplet transmission of infectious agents, employees must place a barrier between the source of the droplet (e.g., a sneeze) and their mucosal surfaces. Such protection could include a surgical mask to cover the mouth and nose and safety glasses to cover the eyes. Recent studies show that aerosol penetration through a surgical mask is highly dependent on particle size, mask construction, and breathing flow rate.

One study showed that penetration rates for submicron particles could be as high as 80 percent for surgical masks.36

Even relatively unconventional uses (e.g., the wearing of multiple surgical masks) have been shown to be less protective than NIOSH-certified respirators. For example, research has shown that the use of up to five surgical masks worn by volun teers results in particle reduction of only 63 percent for one mask, 74 percent for two masks, 78 percent for three masks, and 82 percent for five masks, compared with a recommended reduction of at least 95 percent for properly fitted N95 respirators.37”

36 Chen CC, Willeke K. Aerosol penetration through surgical masks. Am J Infect Control 1992; 20(4):177- 184.

37 Derrick JL, Gomersall CD. Protecting healthcare staff from severe acute respiratory syndrome: filtra- tion capacity of multiple surgical masks. J Hosp Infect 2005; 59(4):365-368.


93 posted on 05/18/2020 2:39:17 AM PDT by deepestsouth1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson