Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ymani Cricket
Oh, and to answer your question in the micro...

To bring Ukraine into the EU for show, as it would already be in the EU in reality. And not to act as a 'buffer' against Russia, but the 'front line' against Russia.

That's short term, as the rest proceeds as I've previously written.

***Editors Note***

Before you get to thinkin', 'Will the raggedys then, rule the world and will we all become muslims? Banish the thought.

(and this is derp think btw, though based in serious though)

(real talk) The raggedys are a backward and rudimentary people, and their religion is barbaric and even more rudimentary. They are incapable of maintain a modern civilization, especially when their religion just went into Super Saiyan mode.

The real derps, masters of manipulation, will eradicate Islam, or meld into some mish mash of a weakened Islam, heathen Chinee, Wesern derp conglomeration. A derp blob, if you will.

And then the divergent elements within the conglomeration will begin to pulsate with a life of their own. Let's face it. China and Islam have a strong sense of superiority and core belief that they were meant to rule the world. And they ain't to shy about it.

So, no telling the timeline, but eventually race and religion based tribalism will turn into nationalism which will turn into revolution and war and guess where we end up? Right back where we started.

The derp dream of utopia is, was, and always has been a wisp of smoke and unnatainable given the nature of man. Derps are too smart to undertqand that, I guess. We simple folk do because we are reality based. In other words, as some here are fond of saying. God Wins. He was always going to win. Trump is just trying to skip all that middle shit.

Cause he's...

#GodsHelper

(see how I mixed that part at the end in to grab the religious people? am I good, or what)

I feel like that wasn't the short answer I started out for it to be. That last sentence just sounds wrong.

Anyway. Late night thoughts brought to you by Bagster's altered state of mind.

I'll stop now.

Or will I?


2,124 posted on 05/20/2020 2:36:19 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2119 | View Replies ]


To: bagster; ransomnote; defconw
That makes sense. But, you forced my hand.

This is bad, really really baaaad! And Trump knows. Haspel knows. Ok lets go back in time a bit to Q Drops 3835 and 3836.

And now the timing of the impeachment and the other delays: The title of DROP 3835 was dubbed "Confidential Banking Records Related to Hunter Biden in Senate Hands"

(Later we can put it all together with Uranium One? And them getting nuclear material to Iran, etc.) What do we have now? In Ukraine there is now a Treason Charge against Poroshenko...

Now in light of yesterdays leaks. Read this.:

"Critical": Biden put pressure on Poroshenko on PrivatBank nationalization, leak claims

Some quotes:

"Biden allegedly asked Poroshenko to support the then-head of the central bank to determine the date for proceeding with nationalization."

Story Quote:

(It is Biden on audio yep)

The voice that is purportedly Joe Biden's says: "Let me ask you one thing before I forget. PrivatBank. I understand the governor of the [national] bank is tentative about setting a date certain for the transition to take place. And I'm being told second-hand, and I know this is her position for sure, that she is unsure of the date until she gets an agreement from you. I told… Here's what I told them.

I told them to get back to her, set a date, and I will talk to you about the date because this is getting very, very close. And I don't want that to happen. I don't want Trump to get into the position where he thinks he is about to buy onto a policy where the financial system is going to collapse and he is going to be looked to to pour more money into Ukraine."

"That's how he'll think about it before he gets sophisticated enough to know the detail. So anything you can do to push the PrivatBank to closure so that the IMF loan comes forward I would respectfully suggest this is critically important to your economic as well as physical security.""

"I know it's difficult, I know Kolomoisky is a pain the ass and a problem for everybody but it really is critical that you guys figure this one out," he is heard saying. "I just want you to give the governor of the bank some spine, let her know that you'll be standing there when she sets a date and moves forward," Biden supposedly told Poroshenko over the phone."

And there's a lot more in the linked story. Next

(The following was in Russian so had to be translated but the gist of it is there)

Full story at link:

"THE DEVIL KNOWS HOW TO DO IT", - THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE ON EXECUTION OF THE COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF SURKIS AGAINST "PRIVATBANK"

"According to Poroshenko, he was asked to do so by the then Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman in order to approve the 2017 budget. "This is confidential information, but ...". "

Biden promised to keep everything a secret.

"It will be recalled that the decision to nationalize the bank was made by the state on December 18, 2016. The reason is the lack of capital in PrivatBank, which was revealed by the results of stress testing." "The question is not about money. Kolomoisky explained why he is being sued over the nationalization of Privatbank issue of nationalization of the financial institution is fundamental for him ..."

:::skipping ahead::: (We have the British in here)

He recalled the course of the case :

In 2017, by a decision of the Pechersk District Court as security for the claim (not based on the merits), PrivatBank was obliged to service the deposits of British companies, which, according to media reports, are affiliated with the Surkis brothers. PrivatBank believed that such deposits did not exist because they had been converted into shares of the bank, and therefore the decision was illegal.

PrivatBank appealed the decision of the Pechersk District Court to the appellate court. In the same year, 2017, the appellate court denied the appeal. One of the British companies filed a court ruling with the Internal Affairs Department in the Pechersk district of Kyiv.

Since 2017, the process of enforcement of the court decision has been underway. In fact, how to force to service deposits, which no longer exist and which are converted into shares, to put it mildly, was not entirely clear (neither the performers nor the debtor - "PrivatBank"), - said Malyuska.

The process of "enforcement" was interrupted in 2019 - in early 2020 due to the fact that the executor, at the request of "PrivatBank", asked for clarification to the Pechersk district court on how the decision can be executed, if deposits are already converted into shares.

The Pechersk District Court did not explain anything particularly new, recreating close to the text what was already the case in 2017.

The decision on clarification was upheld by the appellate court.

 Then - in 2020, according to the Minister of Justice, the following happened:

"On April 23, the Internal Affairs Department completed the enforcement proceedings (no one transferred the money to either the debt collectors or Surkis).

On April 28, six British debt collection companies (each separately) applied for enforcement of the Pechersk District Court's 2017 ruling.

On April 29, the Pechersk District Internal Affairs Department opened enforcement proceedings and sent a corresponding notice to the debtor, PrivatBank.

And now what do we have? A treason case against Poroshenko developing. I'll be watching developments.

2,132 posted on 05/20/2020 3:19:52 AM PDT by Ymani Cricket (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty - John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson