Re: “... this 5G nonsense ...”
You’re right that the technology has been used for awhile now. The dangers may be in increasing the proliferation of all the new base stations that will be needed support the technology for our pervasive hand-held device use.
My understanding is that high-frequency radio waves have a shorter range than lower-frequency waves, meaning many more stations will be required to allow data to travel the short distances necessary for the speed 5G enables. In areas of dense network usage, there could be hundreds more stations, each sending out way more radio waves than we experience now from existing TV, radio and microwave transmissions.
There’s some evidence that excessive amounts of these high frequency waves are disruptive to all life at the cellular level, including plants. Much like vaccines, I think there needs to be more study of the potential impacts of RF-EMFs that we’re exposed to before they make it so and then see the negative effects. No amount of “Oops” can correct the damage at that point.
The short answer is, no one really knows yet, but one of the signs that it may not be good for us is that WHO says 5G is safe. As we all know now, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of WHO, and we also know their goals of depopulation through whatever means necessary and possible. If 5G can destroy or weaken humans at the cellular level, that’s one more tool they and their minions will vigorously support.
John Roberts on FAUX News seems to be trying to walk back their outrageous coverage of HCQ yesterday. He noted the VA study was not conducted by VA doctors and HCQ was then only prescribed to dying patients with extreme comorbidities in their final hours. Probably too little too late for Neil Cavuto to recover any credibility after that psychotic breakdown yesterday.
My understanding is that high-frequency radio waves have a shorter range than lower-frequency waves, meaning many more stations will be required to allow data to travel the short distances necessary for the speed 5G enables. In areas of dense network usage, there could be hundreds more stations, each sending out way more radio waves than we experience now from existing TV, radio and microwave transmissions.
There’s some evidence that excessive amounts of these high frequency waves are disruptive to all life at the cellular level, including plants. Much like vaccines, I think there needs to be more study of the potential impacts of RF-EMFs that we’re exposed to before they make it so and then see the negative effects. No amount of “Oops” can correct the damage at that point.
The short answer is, no one really knows yet, but one of the signs that it may not be good for us is that WHO says 5G is safe. As we all know now, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of WHO, and we also know their goals of depopulation through whatever means necessary and possible. If 5G can destroy or weaken humans at the cellular level, that’s one more tool they and their minions will vigorously support.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you very much for that informative comment.