Posted on 05/17/2020 10:59:11 AM PDT by ransomnote
What are you talking about? How can you make such a bald assertion when you know theres Zero evidence of that. I know its been speculated he did that but its never even been publicly alleged.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I’m a risk taker irl, and I like the odds on him pardoning himself & all the rest of the crooked MFs
bbb
EXCELLENT - I’ve been waiting for this! ThankQ + WWG1WGA :)
NEW Q POSTS
MAY 19. 2020
START AT #1408
gitmo?
My understanding is that high-frequency radio waves have a shorter range than lower-frequency waves, meaning many more stations will be required to allow data to travel the short distances necessary for the speed 5G enables. In areas of dense network usage, there could be hundreds more stations, each sending out way more radio waves than we experience now from existing TV, radio and microwave transmissions.
Theres some evidence that excessive amounts of these high frequency waves are disruptive to all life at the cellular level, including plants. Much like vaccines, I think there needs to be more study of the potential impacts of RF-EMFs that were exposed to before they make it so and then see the negative effects. No amount of Oops can correct the damage at that point.
The short answer is, no one really knows yet, but one of the signs that it may not be good for us is that WHO says 5G is safe. As we all know now, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of WHO, and we also know their goals of depopulation through whatever means necessary and possible. If 5G can destroy or weaken humans at the cellular level, thats one more tool they and their minions will vigorously support.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you very much for that informative comment.
RICE’S TESTIMONY
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/sr44.pdf
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...”And so, when General Flynn was named to his role, we were actually in the
midst of the President’s last foreign trip to Greece, Germany, and Peru. As soon
as we returned from that trip, I reached out to try to introduce myself to General
Flynn and to congratulate him and to offer any and all support that we could
provide. I offered to make myself available for as many hours between that point
and January 20th as he found helpful or necessary. And l, frankly, found myself
chasing him to try to find time that worked on both of our schedules to provide that
handoff.
ln the course of the four meetings that I described, we touched on all the
major - major - policy issues that you might imagine. Obviously, Russia was
one of them. We touched, however, more superficially on Russia than might have
otherwise been the case. This was my judgment. We - he had all the briefing
materials provided to him on Russia, and those remain unchanged. We didn’t talk
about Ambassador Kislyak, to answer specifically your question, but we did talk
about Russia as an adversary, as a threat to NATO. We talked about Ukraine.
We talked about Syria. We talked about lran and Russia in al! of those contexts.
But, frankty, we spent a lot more time talking about China in part because
General Flynn’s focus was on China as our principal overarching adversary. He
had many questions and concems about China. And when I elicited - sought to
elicit his perspective on Russia, he was quite - I started to say dismissive, but that
may be an overstatement. He downplayed his assessment of Russia as a threat
to the United States. He called it overblown. He said they’re a declining power,
they’re demographically challenged, they’re not really much of a threat, and then reemphasized the importance of China.
I had seen enough at that point and heard enough to be a little bit sensitive
to the question of the nature of General Flynn’s engagements with the Russians.
And so, while I certainly gave him what he - what I thought any incoming National
Security Advisor would need, in terms of broad strokes of Russia policy, Ukraine,
Syria, all of those things, I didn’t go into depth on particularly
in the sort of
hard national security realrn. lfigured that he could become briefed on that when
he took office
This is great, because Old Joe already bragged about doing this but some pointed out that he’s a well known prevaricator and he could have been just talking big. Well, now we know he wasn’t just talking big. I liked how the Uke president was like “just so we’re very clear I got the prosecutor general removed so now we can have beeellion dollars US, iss correct?”
Conan The Memer.
>>9241646 (/pb)
It’s a marathon not a sprint.
Q
Sorry, I didn’t see any mention of POTUS Trump:
Live: Trump announces deregulation executive order Just got done Here’s a link (1hr 12min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCvTxYwPSYU
I recall Corney saying let me assure you “Mister” President, you are not the subject of an investigation.
Q 4289
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 19 May 2020 - 3:23:22 PM
Anonymous
19 May 2020 - 2:40:57 PM
>>9241503
yeah yeah wait a tad longer we know
we’re waiting patiently still :)
>>9241646 (/pb)
It’s a marathon not a sprint.
Q
9241646 was an anon that said this:
Humor slide......
Ah the ole Tortoise and Hare theme.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.