I just had this thought.
Q has been talking about how damning the FISA declas would be. But we know that even if it is proved Obama personally requested a declas on Flynn and numerous other Americans, democrats and many normies JUST WON’T CARE.
What if FISA declas is so important because it will instantly implicate the deepstate in a number of other crimes.
What if there was there a FISA on Seth Rich shortly before his murder? If the democrats knew he was responsible for giving their emails to Wikileaks, they must have had some way of knowing how, ie they spied on him with FISA. The FISA declas will show this.
The public will immediately sense something is wrong if the dems were spying on this murdered man and most WILL CARE.
He would not be the only assasinated person who was surveilled illegally shortly before they had an unfortunate accident, suicide, botched robbery. There will probably countless. This revelation would lead directly to subpoenas of emails and other correspondence.
FISA declas will bring down the house
Yes, yes, yes. and yes.
In the spectrum of things + crimes considered here, the FISA stuff has always been the most provable. Once proven then everyone knows that the RATs are what they are and the media is #FakeNews ... then ... one thing after another. It also gets the question of “how do you introduce things legally” ... and that FISC order to investigate all the FISAs was the starting point for that. It’s very tricky, complicated & convoluted.
At least that’s the plan as I’ve understood it :)
TBD + WWG1WGA!
Breitbart, Scalia......?