I’m not sure of what + all exactly - I agree with underlying sentiments & she’s obviously accomplished in her own right, but she’s also been sensationalist in her presentation and she is selling a book (and seemingly more now too). My impression is to treat each of their things in their own right separate from her involvement or other motive and let things stand or fall. It somewhat reminds me of the “Report for the President” thing that many on these threads were quite excited about and their material was semi-worthy but then proved to be “Paytriots” - and, while nothing definitive IMO, I’m wary the same may apply here. TBD + WWG1WGA :)