It's just that some of the people promoting the jogger narrative lied about other things. Well, that's what happens. People with agendas promote stories that promote their agenda and they lie. But it doesn't mean the narrative is wrong in this case. Even a blind squirrel stumbles on a nut sometimes.
Sounds bout right
I was also annoyed. She should have made it clearer.
I think she is arguing that "Benjamin Crump, Shuan King, and Lee Merritt are her "three reasons."
They are known liars and frauds, and if they are involved in this, it's "three reasons" why the whole thing is a fraud.
That's the best stab I can make of what she's trying to say.
“...If somebody writes an article about “Top Three Reasons Why” they better have three of them ... and label them ... and they better actually be reasons. I couldn’t find any reasons clearly laid out and labeled in the article ... or any reasons at all....”
*********************************************************
For folks who don’t “get it” from reading or skimming the article, the three reasons are:
1. Shaun King
2. Lee Merritt
3. Benjamin Crump
“Officials say there is a video of him burglarizing a home...”
If someone makes a statement like that, they had best be able to present the video, and it had better be clear and unambiguous as humanly possible, or the will deservedly get sued by the person’s family.
I don’t know the story yet, but to me, the burden of proof is *ALWAYS* on the shooter, the only exception being if one is in their own house.