If someone is trespassing on someone else's property maybe. On a public street, it's a lot rarer.
Btw, the decedent reacted as if he was desperate, and or pissed off that he’d been caught.
Or p*ssed off that a-holes with guns were after him.
Again, the decedents actions were not those of an innocent jogger.
Nonsense. It wasn't a bright thing to do, but there is always somebody, guilty or innocent, who will lunge at another guy pointing a gun at them if that guy isn't a cop. Adrenaline, panic. Two bearded jack*sses point a gun at you and you may not think it's the time to be reasonable and try to win them over or to surrender and submit to whatever they have in mind.
As people have said, there were no robberies that day, so really what are the odds that the jogger wasn't just an innocent jogger who didn't know what to do when two guys with guns came after him? I'm not saying that they intended to kill him. I'm just saying we shouldn't convict the dead guy of anything without evidence.
Nonsense. It wasn't a bright thing to do
Ya think? And could it also have been out of desperation, or anger because someone was trying to stop him? And even though you implied the decedent simply did something stupid, you really don't know why he ran towards and tired to physical disarm the gunman, do you? Better stick to the evidence at hand.