We have abandoned the Constitution, bankrupted the country all in a pursuit of a remedy that this expert says does not work and, even if it does work, it was never intended to save anyone from getting the virus, it was only intended to postpone that inevitability for each one of us and, incidentally, lower the rate of infection sufficiently so the hospitals can cope with sick people.
Meanwhile we emptied the hospitals of all other patients, killing some no doubt, and bankrupting the hospitals.
So we did all this social distancing which does not work and, even if it does work and did work, was evidently unnecessary because the data upon which the social distancing was implemented was clearly wildly pessimistic and therefore the distancing was unnecessary to keep the hospitals from being overwhelmed.
No Constitution, a bankrupted country, dubious, conflicted and inconsistent science, uncertain results, no meaningful contribution to saving lives overall.
Is that a proper understanding?
