Yup. That's why they're often surprising. I was expecting mainly Celt and maybe some Roman with a smattering of Viking.
What I got on the male side (in descending order) was Frank, Visigoth, Ostrogoth, Danish Viking, Saxon, Celt.
Of course genes from archaeological samples are hardly a representative sampling. But it's still fun to look at.
And you're right, one survivng ancient sample may not give the full picture of that vanished people, but since it is characteristic of that time and place, it's probably not all that far off. :^) By and large, my Ancestry DNA report verely verified what the paperwork shows.
What did you get on the female side?
whoops, verely = merely