Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dadfly
There It Is: CDC Equates Coronavirus Hospitalizations to Seasonal Flu and Finally Admits It’s MUCH LESS Dangerous for Children
Gateway Pundit ^ | 05/02/2020 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 5/2/2020, 11:46:11 AM by SeekAndFind

I posted this information after watching the video of the doctors discussing how the Covid-19 death reportage is artificially inflated by listing patients WITH Covid, along with things like COPD and heart failure, as dying FROM Covid. I listened to Dr. Brix say on video, "...we don't have flu anymore". Yes - that's right, we stopped reporting ANY flu in her little talk. I've seen the distortions and along comes news at Gateway Pundit and several other twitter accounts including D'Souza starting to leak out the corrected data.

57 posted on 05/02/2020 6:32:03 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote

again, thx for the post. i knew we were in trouble when people started claiming that everyone in a room with someone who tested positive must immediately self isolate. even politicians were doing it. that was worse case thinking at it’s most ignorant.

how could they have these large number model predictions without competent testing in place everywhere?

how could this disease be so infective (with ROs estimated as 5 or 6 when simple calculations and assumptions give an RO more like 1.1 or 1.2, given the hard numbers on cruise and military ships and the existing time frame of maybe 40 days).

how come hospitals, ER doctors, isolation rooms, regular rooms were basically empty given the projections by experts.

how come the early real testing numbers (reference labs) were coming back with just >10% of serious respiration patients being positive covid19 and then just a small fraction of those (like maybe 5% being seriously ill from it), and yet this was being touted as the new plague.

and how come 10,000 or so lab and hospital health workers could be tested with only a handful of covid19 positives and even fewer with no symptoms—with them logically being the most at risk population for infection, especially with them running unprotected early in the outbreak, but yet we’re told its rampant everywhere else in the general population.

and yet these fake “science expert” stories and alarming anecdotal death at home alone stories kept coming. and of course the spectre and chimera of nyc and their politicians always egging on the fear. but even in ny there were articles in the small press detailing that outbreaks in nyc were very specific to nursing homes and caregivers and service workers in queens, elmhurst, flushing, etc.

and how about real doctors and nurses being furloughed and laid off despite the dire warnings we must flatten the curve to prevent the medical system from being overwhelmed. even in nyc the hospitals were not overwhelmed. they hardly used the hospital ship Trump sent.

and how can the numbers be so different from place to place given fairly clean data from ca reference labs and hospitals in general. the numbers jibe in most places. but the outliers like italy and nyc determine expert modeling and policy?

and on and on. it’s pretty clear to me that this should have been handled at voluntarily at the individual level for precautions against community spread, and at the business/county level in terms of gov’t health policy to mitigate against the spread of the virus.


62 posted on 05/02/2020 8:13:31 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson