1 posted on
04/29/2020 5:43:23 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
26 in 10,000? sounds like pretty crappo test.
2 posted on
04/29/2020 5:51:17 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: BenLurkin
26 in 10,000? sounds like pretty crappo test.
3 posted on
04/29/2020 5:51:17 PM PDT by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: BenLurkin
A side-by-side (collateral) test with cancer-sniffing dogs might have produced even better—cost-effective results.
11 posted on
04/29/2020 6:28:59 PM PDT by
Does so
(Call it the CCP-virus...The Corona-virus dies in Summer's sunlight! But next spring's Chinese virus?)
To: BenLurkin
I read this as: Of 10,000 women, 26 CANCERS were identified by this blood test. My question would be: how many women in this study were shown to have one of these 26 cancers? Just my thoughts.
12 posted on
04/29/2020 6:32:11 PM PDT by
deweyfrank
(Nobody's Perfect)
To: BenLurkin
I thought there was already one.
My mom sent me a link but i forget the name..
15 posted on
04/29/2020 6:47:12 PM PDT by
mowowie
( day)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson