Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
Suppose Sullivan knew there were ongoing investigations and thus the exculpatory (???) evidence was being used for said investigations and thus could not be made public.

If he knew about the exculpatory evidence, as your hypothesis presumes, he could have seen it without making it public. Happens all the time.

Motion denied.


373 posted on 04/29/2020 7:01:49 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

My hypothis does not entail Sullivan knowing about the nature of the evidence. I assume and it could be wrong totally, that the evidence that Sidney Powell wanted was being used in ongoing investitgations and that is why it could not be handed over, and that there must be some interla legally type message that says this to lawyers who want such evidence.

Hopefully all of this will be made clear pretty soon.


414 posted on 04/29/2020 7:48:13 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson