Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

For those who insist that Zinc should be a major component of any study for it to be successful, this study DID NOT include Zinc.
1 posted on 04/26/2020 5:13:17 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

I’ve heard (maybe it was from you!) that zinc is only needed when there is a deficiency. IIRC, Raoult did not use zinc. Also I asked a doctor on FR about zinc, and she said (in a comment somewhere that I am too lazy to find) that her patients were not given zinc because they had no deficiencies.


2 posted on 04/26/2020 5:22:15 PM PDT by PlateOfShrimp (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

That is a significant P value if I recall my Bio Pharma stats correctly???? Still not a huge population as Dr. Farci would point out.


3 posted on 04/26/2020 5:24:47 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, we do need one with zinc, to verify or refute the efficacy of the original protocol. Also, the control group were patients who refused the treatment, and a real study should be double-blinded, which raises ethical questions that would put a limit on the study. You can’t double-blind a large group of subjects, if the placebo recipients get deathly ill and die. Following clinical results that far is crossing over to Mangele territory.


4 posted on 04/26/2020 5:25:06 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The data looks encouraging but I think some research scientists will still object to its reliability. Because the treatment and control groups were not blindly randomized and normalized for age, gender, pre-conditions, etc it might have skewed the data. If the people that refused treatment happened to be more men who were also obese it could distort the endpoint outcomes because of confounding factors.

Not trying to be negative on this but the skeptics will bring these objection up when this is peer reviewed.


5 posted on 04/26/2020 5:33:56 PM PDT by Dave Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The last study you posted was of advanced cases.

This one is the opposite, given in the early days of symptoms.

Advanced coronavirus cases have severely depleted zinc levels.
They need supplemental zinc for it to work.
They didn’t give it, it didn’t work.

Those in the early days of treatment don’t.
They have normal levels of zinc still.
This study showed it worked without zinc for early patients.

Likewise, those treated with hcq as prophylactic don’t need supplemental zinc for it to work.


7 posted on 04/26/2020 5:39:22 PM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I think this study supports what many doctors have been saying. I hope now studies show the same results. And I hope the media would quit trashing Trump over this issue.


10 posted on 04/26/2020 5:44:11 PM PDT by hawkaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Zinc is not necessary if a person is not seriously deficient. However, Zinc is a necessary component. HCQ works by providing a pathway into the virus for blood zinc. It is the zinc, once inside the virus that stops viral replication.
So, giving zinc along with the other two components cannot hurt. Not giving it to a patient seriously deficient in Zinc will not be effective or, as effective.


14 posted on 04/26/2020 5:57:49 PM PDT by ocrp1982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson