I really hope this guy is squaring with us. I have no doubt that he is being honest with his cure rates.
But I read somewhere that his test subjects only showed symptoms of the Coronavirus but were not actually tested for it.
Could be true. Maybe not. I really don’t know.
Most probably his patients did not have definitive COVID-19 testing done or results in hand when he started treating them. As a good clinician, he knew that if a patient presented with high fever and cough, he made the diagnosis without a test result, before shortness of breath and pneumonitis developed and began treatment.. This turns out to be the most effective approach. His paper no doubt will be criticized for not having a confirmatory test since in the mind of the reviewers they cannot be certain he was truly treating COVID-19. His patients will have no such doubts.