To: reg45
The Russian effort on the eastern front was monumental. Their deaths were in the many millions. It wasn't the communist ideology which enabled the Russians to expel the Nazis; it was the love of country exhibited by the ordinary Russian people. The Stalingrad, Leningrad, and Kursk battles were each in their own ways as important as D-Day.
4 posted on
04/25/2020 1:06:47 PM PDT by
Governor Dinwiddie
(Guide me, O thou great redeemer, pilgrim through this barren land.)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
I would echo that vierwpoint. The Russian losses were staggering. Vainly Stalin pressed for a second front and got to the point that there would be no second front. Stalin did not realize what it took for an over channel crossing. He and Russia being a land based nation when it came to war. The logistics for D-Day were tremendous.
Russia lost much and fought hard. I am not defending Stalin, or communism, nor the actions late in the war to secure an “iron curtain:’ but the will of the Russian people to fight, fight hard and take that battle back to Berlin was truly amazing.
5 posted on
04/25/2020 1:15:04 PM PDT by
abigkahuna
(How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
When Operation Barbarossa occurred, the first thing Stalin did was to rally the Russian people with Russian nationalism, not Communist ideology. And, fortunately, the winter of 41-42 was particularly harsh.
6 posted on
04/25/2020 1:16:58 PM PDT by
reg45
(Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
To: Governor Dinwiddie
I agree with your assessment, however it was American lend lease that allowed/kept the UK and the Soviet Union in the war.
Without that aid both of them would have collapsed.
To: Governor Dinwiddie
Pretty much. No one lost more people in WW II than the Russians did.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson