Peplowski and Lawrence say this new result underscores the caution researchers need when drawing conclusions about atmospheric data, especially with the growing interest in planetary atmospheres in other solar systems.
...
Does this mean that we should be skeptical of consensus?
“Does this mean that we should be skeptical of consensus?”
No. Absolutely not. And shame on you for even thinking that thought.
I’m sending this to Bill DeBlasio.
Does this mean that we should be skeptical of consensus?
https://webmail.lerctr.org/~transit/healy/Uh_Yeah.mp3
Of course! All the unknowns and uncertainties are what makes astronomy and planetary research so interesting.