[DrDude]

You are correct. Much is redacted. Despite the information, I think a FISA signed by a FISA Judge but NOT SIGNED by the Certificants is very problematic. Could it be the third FISA is invalid on its face. Thus making the final FISA “MOOT”? I believe an invalid FISA would have terminated the FISA and renewal wouldn’t have been applicable.

[Steven W.]

You may be on to something here:

I think a FISA signed by a FISA Judge but NOT SIGNED by the Certificants is very problematic. Could it be the third FISA is invalid on its face. Thus making the final FISA “MOOT”? I believe an invalid FISA would have terminated the FISA and renewal wouldn’t have been applicable.

This has been subject of much discussion here over time.

RR testified to Congress and was asked about the FISA he signed. He went on to say that there's been a lot of discussion about the FISA he signed but that what he signed bears no resemblance to what's been discussed or considered. He wouldn't explain any further except to then stress that when signing a FISA the Deputy AG is depending on the sworn testimony of federal agents and that if that was false it would be a very serious problem.

I've considered ... what if the FISA he signed said - in redacted portion - something like, "the prior FISAs in this series were bogus and now the hunters will become the hunted." lol

In addition, Sara Carter has referred to there being multiple sets of books - my thinking is two-fold; one is possibly when the RATs were running things and they tried to hide evidence, etc. - AND/OR - when POTUS took over, there was a sting run and there are two sets of records - one being those that the white hats maintain internally i.e. the real things and, then, another set, which are made available to deep state actors and such ala members of the mule team.

TBD + WWG1WGA :)