I asked a yes or no question I didn’t think was difficult.
I don’t ‘bristle’. I just want to get on the same wave length as you before responding. I would hate to misunderstand your comment like I did with poor stylin19a. (Still sorry about that stylin19a, it was my bad.)
If anything dear, you seem to be the one bristled over my discussing Birx in a manner of which you don’t seem to approve. I understand your disapproval now that I know you don’t think she is DS.
Naturally I will respond differently to someone ridiculing me over some one that is not.
It’s pretty dang funny if you think about it. It’s way too ironic. I’m being ridiculed for being suspicious of ‘Birx Blinking’ on a thread that exist as a constant target of ridicule for things well more outlandish sounding than that thought. This thing has tickled my funny bone and given me some great chuckles.
I am more than happy or not, to DISCUSS Birx Deep State status or not but I stopped letting people tell me what my ‘lying eyes’ have or have not observed a long time ago.
I am more than happy or not, to DISCUSS Birx Deep State status or not but I stopped letting people tell me what my ‘lying eyes’ have or have not observed a long time ago.
***********
Personally, I have a rule of thumb on this issue that so far has served me well and is as follows:
If the person in question has gained status and position in an un-elected office within the FedGov or any of its institutions prior to Trump, that person is Deep State.
No person was allowed to gain position within the fedgov bureaucracy without being known and trusted as Deep State.
The entire system of promotion and personal elevation within the fedgov bureaucracy prior to Trump was all and only about having passed loyalty tests to the Deep State.
No one was allowed any position of power or responsibility within the fedgov bureaucracy without having been fully vetted and passed as loyal to the Deep State.