Posted on 04/20/2020 2:34:04 PM PDT by ransomnote
Yes, the Big Pharma info was extremely revealing.
Bookmarking this one!!
Air shows in major cities or just DC?
Air Show in a major city gives alot of excuses for other things to happen.
Sky event? Seems logical.
BOMBSHELL: FORMAL REBUKE FROM FRENCH DOC ON HCQ!
CHARGE by IMPLICATION: VA + NIH SPONSORED CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
https://twitter.com/raoult_didier/status/1253045368377561093
Didier raoult
@raoult_didier
[TRANSLATED]
The study published in pre-print on 04/21 on Medrxiv by Maganoli et al has three major biases which invalidate its conclusions, in any case absurd and incompatible with the literature. We have detailed these biases in the letter below.
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/response-to-magagnoli-medrxiv-2020/
Response to Magagnoli, MedRxiv, 2020
Matthieu MILLION
https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Response-to-Magagnoli.pdf
In the current period, it seems that passion dominates rigorous and balanced scientific analysis and may lead to scientific misconduct. The article by Magagnoli et al. (Magagnoli, 2020) is an absolutely spectacular example of this. Indeed, in this work, it is concluded, in the end, that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) would double the mortality in patients with COVID with a fatality rate of 28% (versus 11% in the NoHCQ group), which is extraordinarily hard to believe. The analysis of the data shows two major biases, which show a welling to be convinced before starting the work :
The first is that lymphopenia is twice as common in the HCQ groups (25% in the HCQ, 31% in the HCQ+AZ group versus 14% in the no HCQ group, p =.02) and there is an absolute correlation between lymphopenia (<0.5G/L) and fatality rate, which is well known (Tan, 2020) and confirmed here : 28%
deaths, 22% and 11% in the HCQ, HCQ+AZ and No HCQ group, respectively. Lymphopenia is the most obvious criterion of patient severity (in our cohort, lymphocytes in dead individuals (n=22, mean ± standard deviation, 0.94 ± 0.45), versus in the living (n=2405, 1.79 ± 0.84, p < .0001)). As the authors acknowledge, the severity of the patients in the different groups was very different, and their analysis can only make sense if there is a selection of patients with the same degree of severity, i.e. the same percentage of lymphopenia.
The second major bias is that in an attempt to provide meaningful data, by eliminating the initial severity at the time of treatment, two tables are shown: one table where drugs are prescribed before intubation, and which shows no significant difference in the 3 different groups (9/90 (10%) in the HCQ group, 11/101 (10. 9%) HCQ+AZ, and 15/177 (8.5%) in the group without HCQ, chi-square = 0.47, ddl = 2, p = 0.79), and one table, where it is not clear when the drugs were prescribed, where there are significant differences. These differences are most likely related to the fact that the patients had been intubated for some before receiving hydroxychloroquine in desperation. It is notable that this is unreasonable at the time of the cytokine storm, as it is unlikely that hydrochloroquine alone would be able to control patients at this stage of the disease.
Moreover, incomprehensibly, the untreated group actually received azithromycin in 30% of cases, without this group being analyzed in any distinct way. Azithromycin is also a proposed treatment for COVID (Gautret, 2020) with in vitro efficacy (Andreani, 2020), and to mix it with patients who are supposedly untreated is something that is closer to scientific fraud than reasonable analysis.
Altogether these 3 voluntary biases are all pushing to the idea of dangerosity of hydroxychloroquine safest drug as reported on nearly 1 million people (Lane, 2020).
All in all, this is a work that shows that, in this period, it is possible to propose things that do not stand up to any methodological analysis to try to demonstrate that one is right.
I remember thinking that Olympics number was annoying and creepy. Now, my Qniversity education puts it in a whole new light.
where is huma these days?
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3837963/posts?page=1
BREAKING: Trump fires official in charge of overseeing stimulus spending
ajc.com ^ | 4/22/2020 | ArLuther Lee
THOSE WHO YOU TRUST THE MOST ARE THE MOST EVIL.
~~~~~~~~~~~
well, I can’t think of anyone that I trust the most other than DJT.. maybe Pompeo..
who so you think fits this, besides ‘the Pope’, which of course, none of us trust...
Hmmmmm. Ninja or pirate....
Both have their advantages.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
blu, I’m sending you a harem outfit.
Posted:
BOMBSHELL: FORMAL REBUKE FROM FRENCH DOC (Didier Raoult) ON HCQ! [TRANSLATED]
Medrxiv ^ | 12/22/2020 | Didier Raoult
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3837966/posts
::I think one of the pervy directors is Woody Allen. Just a guess.::
~~~~~~~~
Thank you.
all though out our country. some of the major cities some not so major.
I thought Jeffery Epstein would have had a dead man switch. His whole station in life was built on blackmail.
Batman was never dark until the deep state got aholt of him.
Thanks for the post re: Formal Rebuke from French Doc.
My critical thinking skills have gone for the evening. Seriously, it’s a wall of text to me, my fault. Just not focusing.
Is the French Doc saying that that VA study was a crock of malarkey?
the above is from 4/10 but it ties in with our earlier discussion about the warrants..
Durham subpoenas are very interesting!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.