Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MrEdd
https://virologyj.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 Actually, its part of a solution and the First scientific study showed that...fifteen years ago.

Old chloroquine (and derivite) work was done on cell cultures. It says nothing about the drug working in vivo.

Remember that new promising anticancer drugs are discovered every few months -- in vitro.

But I would not argue further, if one wants to believe in magic bullets, why not?

45 posted on 04/17/2020 6:55:20 AM PDT by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: mvonfr

Old Cloroquine work did not include zinc either. But if you want to die trying a new drug that has a kill ratio around the same as the virus, have at it.

But a two in 120 side effect death ratio is not what I call good odds against HCQ zinc with even lesser odds of possible poop problems.


68 posted on 04/17/2020 7:36:09 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson