Prohibiting privacy achieves peace? I'd have figured it would be the opposite.
Oh, well. Aldous Huxley and Demi Moore know best.
Go, go Globalism.
Prohibiting privacy achieves peace? I'd have figured it would be the opposite.
Oh, well. Aldous Huxley and Demi Moore know best.
Go, go Globalism.
and prohibiting Islam
To paraphrase Jonathan Haidt’s research on the psychology of morality, liberals only use TWO moral channels: perceived fairness and care/harm.
In contrast, conservatives use those factors plus in-group loyalty, respect for authority, and sanctity/purity. To liberals, respect for authority is oppressive, in-group loyalty is unfairly exclusive, and valuing chastity and monogamy is unfairly exclusive, too. Ironically, the modern liberals make fun of incels, men who can’t have sex, and mock them for their anger and frustration, when the 1960s libertines at least recognized “make love, not war” defused a lot of that negative emotion.
SJWs have the first two “liberal” channels plus sanctity purity. The difference is that they tend to apply it to food instead of sex, and they hated the infidel who threatens their safety/comfort.
“Brave New World” takes this radical egalitarianism to an extreme. You’re made to fit a certain class and equally interchangeable with anyone in it. And people are themselves a commodity, hence ensuring everyone is youthful and healthy until they’re dead and thus an equally attractive sex partner.
Prohibiting family and privacy prevents unfair exclusion.