Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: amorphous

Regarding your post 574 on the last thread...

Off the bat, I’ll admit sometimes math and I don’t always see eye-to-eye. So feel free to correct me.

Shouldn’t your future estimates take into account the slope of your metric and determine future deaths by the DFI predicted at the time you’re predicting?

But you used the present DFR for your estimate of the future deaths in your graph?


743 posted on 04/12/2020 11:02:47 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts (M / F) : Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
Regarding your post 574 on the last thread...

I didn't see a 574 from me on thread #42. Do you have a link so I can see what I wrote?

748 posted on 04/13/2020 12:08:38 AM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith
Shouldn’t your future estimates take into account the slope of your metric and determine future deaths by the DFI predicted at the time you’re predicting?

The way the math works, is estimates for a certain day are used in calculating the estimate for the following day, so yes, the future numbers build upon previous numbers.

But you used the present DFR for your estimate of the future deaths in your graph?

Yes, you can not get any more accurate numbers than the last reported actual numbers, of course that depends upon how accurate the data itself is. So nightly, I rerun the projection which corrects all numbers down the line based on the best available information. That's how hurricanes are tracked.

As to the uniqueness of the slope, and time length I feel okay in going with, only about 40 days now, I determine, by eyeballing, technical analysis of the US slope, and other country's slopes, and just a plain ol' SWAG of where I think 'the barrier' is and at what date we will hit it. I've arbitrarily plugged in 3% - probably a little too optimistic, and a date of 23 April, IIRC.

'The barrier' is what I saw countries like Korea, Italy, and Spain run into near lower DFI numbers.

For a week or two, these countries oscillated near the 3% level. This doesn't sound like much, until you realize it is an increase of 3% of total deaths every day, and that increase builds upon itself.

In Korea's case which has a low total number of those who have died from the corona virus, new death numbers aren't that high compared to Italy. In Italy's case the total number who have died is high. So even at a low 3% DFI, Italy's number of those who are still dying is very high indeed.

I believe we're going to see a similar pattern in the US. Our DFI, which is about 7% as of last night, is still high. The US is leading the world in number of deaths at 22,105 as of last night. IMO, that means the US may see large numbers dying, even at low DFI numbers.

The the law of exponential growth reasserts itself and numbers start growing rapidly again at 'the barrier'. No epidemiologist here, but to me, this could help explain what epidemiologists often see/call a resurgence.

To end on a positive note, Korea/Italy, are bumping down as low as 1.5% now. That is very encouraging. I want to add the above is from my own observation and YMMV. Let's pray a cure will be available very soon.

916 posted on 04/13/2020 4:20:57 PM PDT by amorphous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 743 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson