Riggs may have owed the mob $100k. Feminism hardest hit. Podcast @ the link.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Libloather
I thought this has been common knowledge for years.
2 posted on
04/10/2020 6:50:13 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Libloather
That match was one of the most enjoyable sports events I ever watched. It was total entertainment.
4 posted on
04/10/2020 6:53:12 AM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Libloather
To: Libloather
A racket.
7 posted on
04/10/2020 6:54:53 AM PDT by
null and void
(By the pricking of my lungs, Something wicked this way comes ...)
To: Libloather
8 posted on
04/10/2020 6:55:08 AM PDT by
Obadiah
(Kill the deep state or lose the Republic.)
To: Libloather
“The “Battle of the Sexes” tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs is one of the most iconic moments in American sports history.”
No. No it is not.
10 posted on
04/10/2020 6:56:35 AM PDT by
John Milner
(Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
To: Libloather
It’s called show business.
also, see Vince McMahon.
13 posted on
04/10/2020 6:58:10 AM PDT by
Fireone
(Build the gallows first, then the wall!)
To: Libloather
Actually, it was the battle of the genders, not the sexes. Either player could have identified as any gender.
I’m grateful for our new enlightenment.
14 posted on
04/10/2020 6:58:24 AM PDT by
bwest
To: Libloather
I don’t know why it was called The Battle of the Sexes when both players were dudes.
16 posted on
04/10/2020 6:59:31 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: Libloather
Oh no, Bobby Riggs was just ahead of his time.
17 posted on
04/10/2020 6:59:42 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Thank God for President Trump!)
To: Libloather
The Riggs-King match illustrates the intellectual depravity of the Left. At that time, Billie Jean King was the #1 rated female tennis player in the world, pitted against a has been male player who even in his prime, was not a top rated professional. Of course she was going to defeat him. Had she been pitted against a similarly ranked male tennis player, such as Jimmy Connors or Bjorn Borg, she would have been crushed.
But the Left used this match to advance feminism. In their view, the King victory proved that not only were women as good as men, they were actually the superior gender, as this match "proved" it.
To: Libloather
One of the Williams sisters was in a mixed doubles match, and she couldn’t do anything.
20 posted on
04/10/2020 7:02:29 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
To: Libloather
“The day of the match, you might feel a slight sting.”
22 posted on
04/10/2020 7:04:07 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Libloather
It had to be rigged from early on.
Riggs had destroyed Margaret Court in the first match. There is no way that Billie Jean King would have agreed to be embarrassed by Riggs if she didn’t know the outcome.
BTW, Court was ranked ahead of King at the time. I have a book by Rod Laver. In it he states flat out that the matvh was rigged.
Having said that, being able to hit to your opponents doubles court is such an advantage that it really could have been a fair game, but it wasn’t.
23 posted on
04/10/2020 7:08:03 AM PDT by
yarddog
( For I am persuaded.)
To: Libloather
Tennis played with a Pro Wrestling Script. Entertainment. ESPN is getting desperate for content. Expect a retrospective report on David v Goliath soon.
25 posted on
04/10/2020 7:14:43 AM PDT by
SES1066
(Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
To: Libloather
Of course it was a racket, it was tennis after all...
26 posted on
04/10/2020 7:16:07 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Libloather
And Riggs rigging a match helped him how? He became a nobody after that match.
32 posted on
04/10/2020 7:31:42 AM PDT by
Bommer
(I am a MAGA-Deplorian! It is the way! It is the only way!)
To: Libloather
Wasn’t there some heavy betting on the outcome that resulted in some guy name Vito telling Riggs it would be healthier to throw the match?
35 posted on
04/10/2020 7:41:19 AM PDT by
Demiurge2
(Define your terms!)
To: Libloather
The sad legacy of this is that it ultimately led to another “Battle of the Sexes”, one that would result in tragedy: Foolish Pleasure vs Ruffian.
40 posted on
04/10/2020 8:11:58 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Libloather
Listening all the way to the end and, even with all the facts laid out, they still emphasize the impact of the match on society. I guess even a fraudulent event can have an impact, but once the fraud is proven you’d think there’d be a reassessment. Just shows how deeply everyone was invested.
43 posted on
04/10/2020 8:25:08 AM PDT by
Tallguy
(Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson