Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster; freepersup
My line of thinking on 1-6, relates to the recently posted 6+ clue.

Just my intuition or guess. YMMV

Great connection. And great intuition.

You may be onto something.

There is this:

9. When I saw the placeholder drop with 6 blank lines & saw "[Non_Civ]", being a military vet, I assumed it meant military. Clapper & Hayden immediately came to mind. But perhaps it means 6 corporations that own MSM?https://t.co/012ey3LpaChttps://t.co/8xI15aW4iY pic.twitter.com/ZDD5lLQMJz— Lisa Mei Crowley 🐸 (@LisaMei62) April 10, 2020


1,012 posted on 04/10/2020 3:11:23 PM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]


To: TruthWillWin

I think you may have nailed it.

-SB


1,015 posted on 04/10/2020 3:15:07 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies ]

To: TruthWillWin

Sun_Q_Tzu twitter thought the ‘non civ’ meant the indictments were criminal versus civil.


1,017 posted on 04/10/2020 3:16:27 PM PDT by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies ]

To: TruthWillWin; bagster

Between POTUS, Q and others, we have been educated on the fact that six (6) just 6- corporations, control 90% of the media dominating our broadcasting “industry”. This is certainly a good fit for the [Set 1] 1-6...

A cloud on this rationale however, is that a [Non_Civ] definition, runs contrary to my way of thinking about corporations.

On the other hand, the Military-Industrial Complex, seems to blur the lines when I think if the “Industrial” side is purely “Civilian”.

The only gray area, which lends itself to defining media corporations as Non_Civ, is by the use of the Defense Production Act, which in essence deputizes corporations for war time production. In such a status, it would be much easier to think of them as Non_Civ.

The recently designated industry giants, falling under the DPA, do not fit into the coup cabal, and none of the parent units of the media have been placed under the DPA umbrella, nor would I expect them to be designated as such any time soon.

A crazy thought just struck me in how they might be designated Non_Civ, if the DPA was used in conjunction with the Emergency Broadcasting System (EBS), bringing these 6 corporations onto a possible war footing. Seems like a really long shot.

My gut leans towards 6 high level individuals in the military. I cannot name 6 off the top of my head. Perhaps, through investigations, 6 corrupt high level military members have been unmasked, and important leverage will be gained by going after them first.

Because we are expecting a big fish to be indicted first, sending ripples in all directions, Hayden is about the biggest military Non_Civ fish that I can think of fitting this description.

There is also the possibility of disinformation being used at this time, and those that least expect it, will get the hammer brought down on them first.

Your take? TY


1,050 posted on 04/10/2020 4:14:18 PM PDT by freepersup (BQQM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies ]

To: TruthWillWin

That was read to be “non-civilian” ... I’ve rather always read it as “non-civil” = criminal vs. civil actions.


1,071 posted on 04/10/2020 4:47:13 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1012 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson