“LOL!I figured you would be able to do the math. It’s pretty obvious what age cohort the 30% of the remaining deaths were from. To me at least. It’s pretty significant that 63% of all COVID-19 mortalities in New York are age 70 and above.”
The distribution for the flu is similar. The point in my post you ignored and are now trying to deflect from..
“Sure I may post without sources, if I am offering a viewpoint. But if I am posting something and representing it as fact, I never knowingly post without a reference. If I do, I would hope I would get called out. Just like I call people out who do so. Deal with it.”
You have been called out numerous times and ignored it. You also have a tendency to conflate other people’s arguments when you cannot refute them.
“’You’re a FLuBro.’
Once you started tossing around the FluBro tag, you had already given up trying to discuss / argue your position in good faith. To each his own.”
Is a word hurting you? What would you like to be called, something that won’t hurt your feelings? I am not going to call you guys “people with a casual disregard for the lives of others when it interferes with them counting their nickels who claim that CCP-19 is no more, or even less, dangerous than the flu in spite of all the evidence to the contrary and who go around saying ‘It’s just the flu, Bro!”. I’ll just shorten all that to “FluBro”. Deal with it. Maybe you shouldn’t have been a FluBro if you don’t like being called one. You don’t get to play the equivalent of the race card: “WHAT did you call me? Did you just call me a ‘FluBro’? How DARE you! That thereby invalidates all your arguments! You are CANCELLED!”
LOL!!! References? Links?
We all contribute to FR as best we can. Thanks for your efforts!
Don't get me wrong, there are many honest flubros, but then there are others who seek to influence public opinion for their own agenda, be it for political or financial gain. Some, too clever by half, expose themselves through the names they use - hoisted by there own egos...