1 Apr: Quadrant Mag Australia: One Dozen Dissenting Second Opinions
by Geoffrey Luck
Here is a list of twelve whose opinions contradict the popular narrative:
Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, microbiologist and infectious disease epidemiologist, formerly of Mainz University Germany: All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.
Dr Joel Kettner, Professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery, Manitoba University, Canada: Ive seen pandemics, one every year. It is called influenza, and other respiratory illness viruses. Ive never seen this reaction, and Im trying to understand why.
Dr John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, Health Research and Policy and Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University USA: If we had not known about a new virus out there, the number of influenza-like illness would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually note that flu this season seems a bit worse than average.
Dr Yoram Lass, former Director General of the Israeli Health Ministry: We all forget the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. At the time there was no Facebook. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations. Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.
Dr Pietro Vernazza, infectious diseases specialist, St Gallen Hospital, Switzerland: In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, one for every 1,000 infected. Often similar to the flu season it affects people who are at the end of their lives If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, physician specialist in pulmonology, Germany: Politicians are being courted by scientists scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it. And what is missing now is a rational way of looking at things.
Dr Yanis Roussel, speaking for researchers at the Mediterranean University Hospital Infection Insitute, Marseille: Systematic studies of other coronaviruses have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for Cov-19 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.
Dr David Katz, founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Centre: I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.
Michael T Osterholm, director of the Centre for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, USA: The best alternative (to a shutdown) will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, while advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing. With this battle plan we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which are lives are based.
Dr Peter Goetzsche, professor of clinical research design and analysis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark: Our main problem is that no one will ever get in trouble for measures that are too draconian. They will only get in trouble if they do too little. Remember the joke about tigers: Why did you blow the horn? To keep tigers away. But there are no tigers here. There, you see!
Frank Ulrich Montgomery, radiologisst, former president of the German Medical Association: I am not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. You cant keep schools and daycare centres closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine.
Professor Hendrik Streeck, epidemiologist and clinical trialist, director of the Institute of Virology, Bonn University, Germany: The new pathogen is not that dangerous. Covid-19 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. SARS-1 is not so infectious but it replicates in the deep lungs, which makes it more dangerous.
https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2020/04/one-dozen-dissenting-second-opinions/
I suspect these twelve do not believe in global warming either and still think that there are only two sexes.
Thanks for posting. I was blasted by some friends on Facebook for posting that article saying it was Russian disinformation and originated from a an extreme right wing source. Glad theres a block your friend toggle on FB :-)