Replies

To: ifinnegan

That is not why the U.S. is not paying for their security.

I'm sure that's part of it. And it wouldn't surprise me if someone talked to Trump and the U.S. did wind up paying.

8 posted on 03/29/2020 1:32:39 PM PDT by DoodleDawg

To: DoodleDawg

You’re always so positive, lol.

17 posted on 03/29/2020 1:36:01 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Prayers for Rush)

To: DoodleDawg

Heh, heh, if anyone talks to Trump, it’ll be the Queen inviting him to drop by the palace anytime.

;^)

22 posted on 03/29/2020 1:39:41 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")

To: DoodleDawg

After Justin said Canada wouldn’t. IDTS. But I’ll keep my hat clean in case I have to eat it.

35 posted on 03/29/2020 1:58:27 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance. Nemo me impune lacessit!)

To: DoodleDawg

“And it wouldn’t surprise me if someone talked to Trump and the U.S. did wind up paying.”

Not a chance. None.

On what basis should taxpayer dollars be spent to protect some random starlet and her Brit husband?

38 posted on 03/29/2020 2:01:01 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794