Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

No. It actually is not. A retrospective study of mortality is a VERY legit medical question. Thousands of papers are published. We have a “tailor made” retrospective study of mortality that could be done form the 2,000 cases of seriously ill and dead. You can’t tell me none of them were on Plaquenil a month ago. What has happened to them is a very legit question to ask and the answer can be known in milliseconds.


150 posted on 03/25/2020 10:45:18 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: wastoute

Okay, it’s a legitimate question, but only for academic purposes.

Your question has no legitimacy in the discussion of whether to use this medication to treat coronavirus.

Potential benefit is saving the patient’s life. Potential risk is diarrhea and nausea.

Potential benefits outweigh potential risks.

Risk of not taking it is rapid death from respiratory distress.


159 posted on 03/25/2020 10:49:07 AM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson