Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

“The study, which included 30 patients with a control of 15 who received no treatment, with the other half being treated with hydroxychloroquine, showed that there was a statistically insignificant difference in the number of patients who tested negative for the drug after a week. During the study, those who received conventional treatment were provided anti-virals that are currently recommended for use in China, including Iopinavir and ritonavir, and after a week, 13 of the 15 control patients showed no sign of the virus, while 14 of the 15 who were treated with hydroxychloroquine showed the same.”

Stupid, misleading, idiotic article.

The first part of this paragraph says that the control group received no treatment. Later on it says the control group “ received conventional treatment were provided anti-virals that are currently recommended for use in China, including Iopinavir and ritonavir”


146 posted on 03/25/2020 10:33:50 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: aquila48
The study only referenced "conventional treatment" which isn't the same as "no treatment and if it means using Iopinavir and ritonavir which are HIV retrovirals, then they definitely didn't get "no treatment." I would say "conventional treatment" is different than "no treatment."

I do wonder what Techcrunch's basis is for saying those two drugs are "conventional treatment" in China. I've seen they were doing a study with those drugs, that's it.

154 posted on 03/25/2020 11:22:16 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Vote Giant Meteor in 2020)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson