Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
For the mathematically inclined:

R0 ∝ t × c × d

None of these three numbers are things we can directly measure, especially in the course of an epidemic spread, but we can take other information and estimate it using models. The key point here is that R0 by definition represents the number of new cases following an individual case.

That turns the progress of an epidemic into a familiar equation:

number of new cases = number of starting cases × R0n

where n is the number of "generations".

If that doesn't look familiar, look at your credit card bill. It's the same way interest is calculated — (1+r)n. R0 here is just principle and interest.
5 posted on 03/19/2020 7:53:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Yes, epidemiology. No measure of “velocity”. Because every epidemic ever studied was retrospective. Now we desperately need a measure of velocity and not one with a lot of initegrals and Sigmas. The truest indicator I can think of is how many days until the number of dead each day doubles. That’s what I am watching.


12 posted on 03/19/2020 7:58:22 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson