[venizelos]

Disestablishmentarian wrote:

...a cult-like following has developed comprising some of the followers of Q. ... If you want to blast me for saying all this ... then YOU are involved in cultlike psychology. Think about it.

bagster replied:
It is not productive to agree with and reinforce the derp media's narrative concerning the Great Awakening. Save that for the sleepy eyed old, done men beyond the trees.

_____________________________________________

Thank you, Bagster!

I was trying to tell him that before.

But you said it so much better! :-)

[bagster]

But you said it so much better! :-)

I pride myself on saying it so much better, with my arrogant ass.

😉

[Disestablishmentarian]

Thank you, Bagster! I was trying to tell him that...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I stand by what I said because it is the truth.

I specifically said "Some" have developed cult mentality in ascribing to Q Godlike abilities. I did not call out specific individuals, but if the shoe fits ...

Bags was apparently concerned that even mentioning this would give the anti-Qs a rhetorical weapon against those of us who value Q normally--as an active intelligence unit, an administration insider, an important alternate communications channel for the President and a vital psyop.

I simply disagree with Bags as to approach towards the cultish elements, but we are in full agreement as to objectives. DENIAL of an issue involving "Some" within the Q movement is NOT THE BEST RESPONSE. As a matter of fact, I often read the most hair-brained assertions of these "Omniscient Q" people as DISINFORMATION--deliberately inserted to cause HARM.