To: rllngrk33
Of course not. He’ll have a heart attack or stroke, which can be arranged. Then they’ll pull out their real choice. Who? I don’t know. Hillary? Lurch? Michelle? Personally, I’d prefer Tulsi Gabard. She at least would be interesting, if a leftard, and she would lose with honor.
42 posted on
03/12/2020 3:06:43 AM PDT by
Eleutheria5
("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
To: Eleutheria5
Hillary? Lurch? Michelle? Personally, Id prefer Tulsi Gabard.
Hillary, no. She's on Democrat voters' excrement lists for losing to Bad Orange Man in the first place. They now realize that happened because she is REALLY unlikeable and has not gotten any better in that area over the past four years.
Lurch? No. After all he got swiftboated and lost to the EEEEEEEEEVIL George W. Bush. He's about as appealing as an old potato that is starting to shrivel and grow eyes.
Tulsi? No. Believe it or not she is viewed by most Dem voters as WAY too conservative and something of a sellout. Her past support of 2A really chafes a lot of them in the crotch.
Moochelle? Likely the best possibility but she has a problem. The Dems have spent nearly 5 years attacking Trump on a daily basis as an incompetent buffoon who never should have gotten elected because he has no prior experience in elected office. Big Mike has the identical problem.
43 posted on
03/12/2020 6:10:38 AM PDT by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson