It’s a supposition.
Because it’s almost like Hatfield didn’t read his own industry’s publications on the matter:
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/lab-made-coronavirus-triggers-debate-34502
Or at least didn’t think anyone ELSE did.
I worked in the business long enough to know most of them take money from CCP. And almost all of them lie about it.
It’s an ‘I wouldn’t swear it on a bible but I’d sure as hell bet on it in Vegas’ statement.
And it’s interesting to ME, that YOU are taking up for CCP.
Why is that?
Because Hatfield’s statement was over a month ago.
And everyone ELSE in the business is NOW operating on the assumption that this was a research microbe that walked out of the BL4 lab in Wuhan.
Even the ccp sideways admits that now.
Shall I cut/paste the major publications floating the theory that some poorly paid lab tech sold research animals for money?
Who wouldn’t want a pangolin rack of ribs?
“It’s a supposition.”
So you don’t have any evidence that Steve Hatfield is being paid by China and acting as their agent? And yet that’s what you were saying just a few posts upthread?
“Because Hatfield’s statement was over a month ago.”
And he’s still making it. Hatfield is a regular guest on Steve Bannon’s daily podcast. And like all careful analysts he isn’t claiming to know what hasn’t been proven when there are other plausible explanations.
“And it’s interesting to ME, that YOU are taking up for CCP.”
Oh, so now I’m an agent for the Chinese Communist Party.
Well unlike Hatfield that smear won’t damage my professional reputation as a virologist and American expert on biological warfare since I don’t have one.
So I’m probably a safer target for you to smear.
What it does do is reveal your willingness to casually engage in falsehood. Seems to be your fallback position.