it seems so long ago, but it was about 10 days back maybe that we were discussing this on the threads. I’ll try to go back and find it.
oh, here’s one, The NYPost picked it up but quotes the Taiwan article
https://nypost.com/2020/02/19/whistleblower-doctors-say-coronavirus-reinfection-even-deadlier/
another NYP story on reinfection:
Im not certain that this is not bi-phasic, like anthrax, he said, meaning the illness might recur after appearing to go away.” Professor Philip Tierno of the New York University School of Medicine told Reuters
https://nypost.com/2020/02/27/woman-who-recovered-from-coronavirus-tests-positive-for-it-again-in-japan/
then there’s the autopsy video where a doctor describes bits of heart muscle in the blood as one would find with a heart attack, but the patient didn’t have a heart attack.
at about 2:20:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0A0LyMru3I
best I can do for now. Hope this is helpful
Re: 794 - Thanks for the info.
I guess the question is - is re-infection atypical? Or not?
Was the woman from Osaka completely treated and “cured” (my word).
What was the sensitivity of the test used that was used to problem her “cured”.
Just too much information not known. I’m not comfortable calling reinfection “common” (again my word) to COVID-19 when it could be atypical.