Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Unless the projectile is rocket propelled, I cant see how a tube that short could possibly accelerate a mass sufficient to send it out 1000 miles.

Need my bs meter.


3 posted on 02/27/2020 6:07:15 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag

If you read the article, it assumes a guided, self-propelled projectile.


4 posted on 02/27/2020 6:12:10 AM PST by StoneRainbow68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

Of course, the round for extreme ranges will include additional propulsion and terminal guidance. A prototype munition exists but I do not know if it has been fired.

BTW, the first picture in Popular Mechanics is a display piece at Ft. Sill, OK. 1950’s era weapon.


6 posted on 02/27/2020 6:21:28 AM PST by centurion316 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

The article provides a possible explanation.


9 posted on 02/27/2020 6:37:05 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Blueflag

They are speculating the “shell” is ramjet-powered. Ramjets are more fuel-efficient than rockets, since they use air instead of carrying their own oxidizer, but need to be going above Mach 1 to work. They speculate the gun gets the shell up to speed, and the engine takes over.

So the gun is really a launcher for a ramjet missile.


32 posted on 02/27/2020 9:38:10 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson