So Thomas Fleming, historian and native son of Massachusetts, shouldn’t write a book if you disapprove of it?
Better ask him why he does it. Maybe he does it to piss off people who prefer hagiography over history they’d prefer to ignore.
Don’t know why it should bother you, you won’t be reading it anyway.
It’s not the book. It’s the constant rehashing of the entire thing. On and on and on.
I guess it’s good to have a hobby.
(You might want to work on your “old man on the porch” attitude. People might think you are a pompous ass.)