Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg; Kalamata

When the CSA states left in 1861 the remaining USA states had more than enough votes to end slavery.

The states that had been interfering with that goal weren’t in Congress anymore.

And yet the ruling Republican Party waited until January 1865 to pass the proposed 13th Amendment and it wasn’t ratified until December.

What prevented them from doing this years earlier?


131 posted on 03/04/2020 11:27:58 AM PST by Pelham (RIP California, killed by massive immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Pelham

an opinion, Possibly the status of Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, were part of the consideration in not pushing for the abolition of slavery. By late 1864, it was obvious, to most, that the South was going to lose the war. By that time it made no difference what those border states did, it would not effect the outcome of the war.


133 posted on 03/04/2020 11:33:26 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Pelham
When the CSA states left in 1861 the remaining USA states had more than enough votes to end slavery.

And they did eventually.

And yet the ruling Republican Party waited until January 1865 to pass the proposed 13th Amendment and it wasn’t ratified until December.

Actually the 13th Amendment passed out of the Senate in the spring of 1864. But it required a two-thirds vote in the House to send it to the states for ratification and there were enough Democrats to prevent that from happening.

What prevented them from doing this years earlier?

Democrats and fighting the ongoing rebellion would be my guess.

138 posted on 03/04/2020 11:53:37 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: Pelham

Lincoln worried that the border states might rebel if he moved to quickly on emancipation. He believed it was more important to win the war first, then to free the slaves.

Much like the constitutional founding fathers thought it was more important to have all the states remain a part of the Union then it was to get rid of slavery.


142 posted on 03/04/2020 12:16:41 PM PST by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson