Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kalamata

In war, there are two options, you win or you lose. Had the Southerners decided not to go to war. They would have been able to keep their slaves and avoided “million” deaths.
The South lost the war.


117 posted on 03/04/2020 10:03:19 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: Bull Snipe

>>Bull Snipe sniped: “In war, there are two options, you win or you lose. Had the Southerners decided not to go to war. They would have been able to keep their slaves and avoided “million” deaths.”

The South was invaded.

Mr. Kalamata


123 posted on 03/04/2020 10:11:43 AM PST by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

To: Bull Snipe
In war, there are two options, you win or you lose. Had the Southerners decided not to go to war. They would have been able to keep their slaves and avoided “million” deaths.

Which means that slavery was not the thing over which each side was fighting, because they both agreed that would be kept without a war.

Meaning the Union war effort was not about slavery. It was about control. (Of the South's economic production for the benefit of the crooks in New York and Washington DC who had manipulated the laws to funnel money into their pockets.)

170 posted on 03/07/2020 11:29:48 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty."/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson